Managing Procedural Memory in LLM Agents: Control, Adaptation, and Evaluation
Abstract
Procedural memory enhances LLM agents on workplace tasks through skill transfer across roles and models, with varying generalization capabilities affecting deployment strategies.
Procedural memory is increasingly used to improve LLM agents on recurring workplace tasks, yet its ability to produce reusable skills remains poorly understood. We introduce AFTER, a benchmark of 382 realistic enterprise tasks spanning six professional roles and 22 procedural skills, designed to evaluate how skills transfer across tasks, roles, and model backbones. The benchmark includes controlled evaluation settings for local improvement, cross-task transfer, cross-role transfer, and cross-model generalization. Experiments show that procedural memory delivers consistent gains in industrial workflows: a single refinement round improves aggregate performance by 3.7-6.7 points, while skills evolved from diverse multi-model execution traces achieve 73.1% cross-model test accuracy, outperforming all single-model trace sources. We further find that some skills generalize broadly across tasks and models, whereas others become specialized to role-specific workflows and lose effectiveness under transfer. These results provide practical guidance for building, evaluating, and deploying procedural memory systems in production agent platforms.
Community
AFTER is a benchmark for studying procedural memory in LLM agents: 382 realistic tasks across 6 professional roles and 22 procedural skills, mixing single- and multi-skill workflows over difficulty tiers. Its controlled splits separate how much a skill helps in its original context from how well it transfers to held-out tasks, other professional roles, and different model backbones, giving four evaluation regimes: local improvement, cross-task, cross-role, and cross-model transfer. This lets procedural-memory and skill-evolution methods be measured by whether learned skills actually generalize, treating skills as evolving artifacts learned from experience rather than static, hand-written prompts. Check full description here.
The focus on procedural memory in LLM agents is a critical pivot from simple RAG to actual operational competence. Most 'agentic' frameworks today just wrap a prompt around a tool, but the real bottleneck is the lack of a durable, reusable skill layer that doesn't require a full context window refill every time. The AFTER benchmark's approach to testing cross-role transfer is exactly the kind of engineering rigor we need to move past 'demo-ware' and toward deployable enterprise systems. If we can't quantify how a skill transfers from one professional role to another, we're just guessing at the reliability of the system. This is a solid step toward treating agent skills as first-class software artifacts rather than stochastic accidents.
Get this paper in your agent:
hf papers read 2606.23127 Don't have the latest CLI?
curl -LsSf https://hf.co/cli/install.sh | bash Models citing this paper 0
No model linking this paper
Datasets citing this paper 1
Spaces citing this paper 0
No Space linking this paper
Collections including this paper 0
No Collection including this paper
